Racism is a word that can be defined in many different ways to people. To some, racism is a way of life, and to others, it is a repulsive term that represents closed-mindedness. Racism comes from different cultural values, ethnic backgrounds, as well as the physical appearances. The conflict of racism occurs when the majority group of society feels that the different cultures and values of the minority group brings the deviance to the society. The United States of America, which brought people from all over the world, is stated as the land of opportunity and freedom, it is also the country that is notorious for the racial discrimination. From the beginning of this country, there were conflicts with the Indians, slavery of blacks, and going against the people who immigrated here hoping to achieve the American dream. Racism have been one of the most significant issues that people have been facing and fighting for, and is still occurring around us without even knowing.
I have not felt any serious racism against me so far since I am a ESL student and had only been here for such a short period of time. Although the society that I am living in now is like the melting pot of all different cultures, I was able to figure out during my stay at school that most people who were in the same color used to get along together. I also heard about the experience of racism that my uncle had, who immigrated here about 6 years ago. My uncle owns a store in the city of Tustin, which he often had to put up with racist customers. One of his experiences was when he was telling the total price of the customer’s total price. The customer was mocking my uncles pronunciation and made my uncle repeat himself over ten times even though the price was shown on the customers screen of the cashier. One other time that he felt racially discriminated against, was when the customer just threw the money at him, and when he did the same thing back, the person used profanity against his ethnic background. Not only did his experience ruin his day but it also made him to belittle himself for not being able to get the respect he wanted. Therefore, racism must be eliminated. I feel that no matter how different our appearances are, or different cultural values we have, it does not make up the reasons for the conflicts of racism. We should respect each other’s cultural values, and learn the good of it and make things peaceful. The different skin colors of black, brown, yellow or white only tells us the world that god created is made up of different people, with their own unique characteristics and values. We are all human beings, and this simple fact means that we are all equal.
Throughout the history, racism has been a major factor in many of the important events in our nations past. Racism can be defined as subjectivity in laws that deny individuals unalienable rights. It is something that was true against the blacks at the period of slavery and is still partly true. And we should not forget this tragic moment of our history and not let it renovate again. Blacks did not have the rights for free speech nor vote and many other laws that denied their unalienable rights. But through the determined wills of blacks to get their rights, eventually they had the rights to get freedom of speech and voting. But often the racist Ku Klux Klan threatened their lives. And some unintelligent laws were passed to prevent them from voting such as the grandfather clause (the law that said, in order to vote, their grandfather had to be the person who voted before), or they had to answer the questions that they would have never known, to vote. The blacks fought hard for their rights risking their lives and it made the United States of America the way it is today. We have the laws that protect our rights and freedom, free education to the poor no matter what their ethnicity is. I believe that the United States of America, which was the country that has undeniable history of racism, is becoming the country that brings the world without racism.
Racism kills and at the same time saves the people. It could kill them because it could discriminate them and hurt them in many ways. They could also be disadvantaged and become the victims of the society. But in another point of view, at the same time racism saves them, because through the discrimination, they become stronger and confirmed about themselves. They could also build the power and determine the will to overcome the barrier of racism and not become the victims of society but become part of it.
How would it feel like if you were walking around and saw people laughing at you, pointing at you or making fun of you? Racism is an irrational belief in the superiority of a given group, nation or people, usually ones own. Racism could occur even though other people do not care about how you look like, because one could be afraid of going near to them thinking that they are completely different and that they would make fun of you if you make any mistakes. Racism has declined currently, but is still an important factor we all should talk about. Although removing racism from our world would cause people a lot of sacrifices and suffering, I hope that we would be able to overcome all those incidents and live in a place where we do not care about an individual skin color or nationality.
__________________
Warning!!! This is just a sample Racism essay (Racism essay example) which cannot be used as your own paper. You can contact our custom essay writing service which provides college and university students with high-quality custom written essays, term papers, research papers, thesis papers and dissertations on Racism topics.
Get professional Racism essay writing help from our professional Ph.D. and Master's academic writers. A+ quality and 100% plagiarism are guaranteed! Feel free to ORDER A CUSTOM ESSAY ON RACISM RIGHT NOW and you won't be disappointed.
Tuesday, June 23, 2009
Global Warming Dissertation
Global warming is an important issue for humans to consider and science to figure out. Personally I don't care very much about global warming and have never been active in green movements. The evidence presented in this class is very informative and useful when taking into account the numerous known and unknown causes and cures for global warming. However, my attitude towards global warming is unchanged.
According to the Common Attitudes Toward Global Warming handout I think that my attitude can be described as a mix between several of the listed attitudes. The strongest attitude I have is the Precautionary Principal. It is clear to most of the scientific community that the average temperature of the earth's surface is increasing. I have faith in science; therefore I believe that steps should be taken to figure out what is going on. I don't mean taking an alarmist position and believing that drastic actions should be taken now. There is too little evidence showing that the world will be lost because of global warming. I don't feel a responsibility toward future generations. I think that mankind should go on for a long time enjoying nature as I have all my life. But to blame myself or try to hold others accountable to future generations would be a waste of time for me. I believe that a technological fix will be necessary and has already been employed to help reduce or reverse global warming. Searching for cleaner burning fuels, filters and scrubbers used in power plants, and refrigerant systems using CFC free refrigerants are just three examples of how technology has helped and will continue to help our atmosphere and environment.
The amounts of question and uncertainties covered in this class have been most influential in reinforcing my attitudes and beliefs about global warming. There are too many unknowns for me to get committed and really take an activist position on global warming. The missing CO2 problem is an issue that helped me determine there are too many unknowns to really care enough to try to make a difference.
The recent rise in global average temperatures is interesting at best for me. I am not too concerned by the possible impacts like a rise in sea level or adverse effects to human health; since I am 29 years old it is unlikely to effect me during my lifetime. I'm more concerned that global cooling will occur due to a massive volcanic eruption. Take the world's largest caldera which makes up Yellowstone National Park. If it erupts again it could kick off another ice age or even destroy the earth forever. Or maybe there will be major volcanic eruptions, like Mt. Pinatubo in 1991, more frequently that will help balance the earth's heat budget by, "inject(ing) sub microscopic particles in(to) the stratosphere..." which can "act to cool the earth's surface by scattering and absorbing solar radiation." According to the discovery channel the frequency of volcanic eruptions is increasing. This is just another reason I don't get all worked up about the global warming issue.
Climate models are important to us, clearly they are not perfectly accurate but we need to keep trying. The evidence suggests that computer models are getting better as computers operate faster and as feedbacks are better understood. I think that in the future predictions will get better but they will still be predictions which can have unpredicted outcomes. I think that impact studies are good to an extent. They are still predictions and it is important that people who use them to make decisions regarding the affects of climate change on humans and ecosystems understand that impact studies are not necessarily fact. Any decisions to act, not to act, spend or not to spend based on climate models and impact studies should be done very carefully.
I think the U.S. government should force corporations that are known to be responsible for releasing greenhouse gas emissions to reduce them. However, I think it will be difficult to do without any reliable data to prove that the greenhouse effect is the cause of global warming. Corporations will inevitably resist the proposed costs necessary to reduce emissions which may lead to costly legal battles. Without rock solid proof it will be nearly impossible to change the status quo. This is another reason why continued research with climate models must continue. When a reliable enough model is available then and only then can corporations be forced to act. The auto industry is making steps to produce cars with reduced emissions and that use alternative fuels. Unfortunately most individual consumers seem to want the big gas guzzling SUV's. But research is being done that may lay the groundwork for laws that require new vehicles to have much lower greenhouse emissions.
I am not willing to do a single thing to help reduce greenhouse gasses. I race my car and I hate the fact that I have to get emission testing done to my vehicle every couple of years. Race cars that are not street legal are exempt from many of the regulations regarding emissions. However, my street car is also my race car at track events on weekends. There are ways to get around the emission and catalytic converter issue, which I do and have done for the past 13 years. I remove the catalytic converter and emissions equipment which increases horsepower and torque; which every race car driver wants. But when I get the notice in the mail to get the car emission tested I put the stock emissions equipment back on. It is a cost that I have learned to accept but I still don't like it. When my personal liberties are limited by the government I usually do not appreciate it, especially regarding my love for the internal combustion engine and my drive to make it faster, no matter how much fuel I burn. But there is another prong to my beliefs about global warming and greenhouse emissions. For the past 5 years I've spent six months out of the year on a fishing boat in the NE Atlantic. I don't want to see fish populations decrease or move somewhere else because the oceans rising temperature. But in the last 5 years I have fished I have seen the fish populations increase. I believe that the fishing regulations are responsible for that. I feel that I don't want bad things to happen to wildlife because of global warming. On the other hand I may be contributing to global warming with my blatant disregard for governmental regulations regarding emissions testing; very strange. But the truth is that I'm not convinced that the earth's surface will continue to warm indefinitely, if we as humans don't change our ways.
I will be a follower and an individual on the issue of global warming. I don't ridicule any body seriously for their opinions or stance regarding the environment. I just hope that decisions that will cost people money are made wisely.
__________________
Warning!!! This is just a sample Global Warming dissertation (Global warming dissertation example) which cannot be used as your own paper. You can contact our custom dissertation writing service which provides college and university students with high-quality custom dissertations, thesis papers and research proposals on Global Warming topics.
Get professional Global Warming dissertation writing help from our professional Ph.D. and Master's academic writers. Premium quality and 100% plagiarism are guaranteed! Feel free to ORDER A CUSTOM DISSERTATION ON GLOBAL WARMING RIGHT NOW and you won't be disappointed.
According to the Common Attitudes Toward Global Warming handout I think that my attitude can be described as a mix between several of the listed attitudes. The strongest attitude I have is the Precautionary Principal. It is clear to most of the scientific community that the average temperature of the earth's surface is increasing. I have faith in science; therefore I believe that steps should be taken to figure out what is going on. I don't mean taking an alarmist position and believing that drastic actions should be taken now. There is too little evidence showing that the world will be lost because of global warming. I don't feel a responsibility toward future generations. I think that mankind should go on for a long time enjoying nature as I have all my life. But to blame myself or try to hold others accountable to future generations would be a waste of time for me. I believe that a technological fix will be necessary and has already been employed to help reduce or reverse global warming. Searching for cleaner burning fuels, filters and scrubbers used in power plants, and refrigerant systems using CFC free refrigerants are just three examples of how technology has helped and will continue to help our atmosphere and environment.
The amounts of question and uncertainties covered in this class have been most influential in reinforcing my attitudes and beliefs about global warming. There are too many unknowns for me to get committed and really take an activist position on global warming. The missing CO2 problem is an issue that helped me determine there are too many unknowns to really care enough to try to make a difference.
The recent rise in global average temperatures is interesting at best for me. I am not too concerned by the possible impacts like a rise in sea level or adverse effects to human health; since I am 29 years old it is unlikely to effect me during my lifetime. I'm more concerned that global cooling will occur due to a massive volcanic eruption. Take the world's largest caldera which makes up Yellowstone National Park. If it erupts again it could kick off another ice age or even destroy the earth forever. Or maybe there will be major volcanic eruptions, like Mt. Pinatubo in 1991, more frequently that will help balance the earth's heat budget by, "inject(ing) sub microscopic particles in(to) the stratosphere..." which can "act to cool the earth's surface by scattering and absorbing solar radiation." According to the discovery channel the frequency of volcanic eruptions is increasing. This is just another reason I don't get all worked up about the global warming issue.
Climate models are important to us, clearly they are not perfectly accurate but we need to keep trying. The evidence suggests that computer models are getting better as computers operate faster and as feedbacks are better understood. I think that in the future predictions will get better but they will still be predictions which can have unpredicted outcomes. I think that impact studies are good to an extent. They are still predictions and it is important that people who use them to make decisions regarding the affects of climate change on humans and ecosystems understand that impact studies are not necessarily fact. Any decisions to act, not to act, spend or not to spend based on climate models and impact studies should be done very carefully.
I think the U.S. government should force corporations that are known to be responsible for releasing greenhouse gas emissions to reduce them. However, I think it will be difficult to do without any reliable data to prove that the greenhouse effect is the cause of global warming. Corporations will inevitably resist the proposed costs necessary to reduce emissions which may lead to costly legal battles. Without rock solid proof it will be nearly impossible to change the status quo. This is another reason why continued research with climate models must continue. When a reliable enough model is available then and only then can corporations be forced to act. The auto industry is making steps to produce cars with reduced emissions and that use alternative fuels. Unfortunately most individual consumers seem to want the big gas guzzling SUV's. But research is being done that may lay the groundwork for laws that require new vehicles to have much lower greenhouse emissions.
I am not willing to do a single thing to help reduce greenhouse gasses. I race my car and I hate the fact that I have to get emission testing done to my vehicle every couple of years. Race cars that are not street legal are exempt from many of the regulations regarding emissions. However, my street car is also my race car at track events on weekends. There are ways to get around the emission and catalytic converter issue, which I do and have done for the past 13 years. I remove the catalytic converter and emissions equipment which increases horsepower and torque; which every race car driver wants. But when I get the notice in the mail to get the car emission tested I put the stock emissions equipment back on. It is a cost that I have learned to accept but I still don't like it. When my personal liberties are limited by the government I usually do not appreciate it, especially regarding my love for the internal combustion engine and my drive to make it faster, no matter how much fuel I burn. But there is another prong to my beliefs about global warming and greenhouse emissions. For the past 5 years I've spent six months out of the year on a fishing boat in the NE Atlantic. I don't want to see fish populations decrease or move somewhere else because the oceans rising temperature. But in the last 5 years I have fished I have seen the fish populations increase. I believe that the fishing regulations are responsible for that. I feel that I don't want bad things to happen to wildlife because of global warming. On the other hand I may be contributing to global warming with my blatant disregard for governmental regulations regarding emissions testing; very strange. But the truth is that I'm not convinced that the earth's surface will continue to warm indefinitely, if we as humans don't change our ways.
I will be a follower and an individual on the issue of global warming. I don't ridicule any body seriously for their opinions or stance regarding the environment. I just hope that decisions that will cost people money are made wisely.
__________________
Warning!!! This is just a sample Global Warming dissertation (Global warming dissertation example) which cannot be used as your own paper. You can contact our custom dissertation writing service which provides college and university students with high-quality custom dissertations, thesis papers and research proposals on Global Warming topics.
Get professional Global Warming dissertation writing help from our professional Ph.D. and Master's academic writers. Premium quality and 100% plagiarism are guaranteed! Feel free to ORDER A CUSTOM DISSERTATION ON GLOBAL WARMING RIGHT NOW and you won't be disappointed.
Abortion Research Paper
Abortion, in my opinion, has been one of the largest debatable issues in AmericanSociety. There are so many aspects andviews to examine before one can even begin to form their own opinion.
Politician's views are quite different thanthe views of a religious person. Ibelieve the most important aspect to consider is the medical side of abortion. There are so many medical facts that makeabortion very dangerous. Personally, Iam pro-life. I do not think there isany reason for an abortion because there are so many other alternatives. After researching the facts, and seeing themedical, political and religious views, I believe most of our society wouldagree with me in saying abortion should not be an option. Clinicalresearch provides a growing body of scientific evidence that having an abortioncan cause psychological as well as physical harm to women. Many times, after anabortion, women feel worthless and victimized because they failed at the mostnatural of human activities- the role of being a mother. Many women who have had an abortion alsosuffer from PAS ( post-abortion syndrome). Women suffering from PAS may experience drug and alcohol abuse, personalrelationship disorders, sexual dysfunction, repeated abortions, communicationdifficulties, damaged self-esteem and even attempt suicide. Even using anesthesia, 97% of womenexperience pain during an abortion. They may experience complications such as bleeding, hemorrhage,laceration of the cervix, menstrual disturbance, inflammation of thereproductive organs, and serious infection. Death of the mother is the most serious danger of abortions, but hasbeen very rare. Some evidence has beenshown that abortion can increase the risks of breast cancer. Ibelieve it is hard to understand the political views of abortion. In my opinon, politicians will often saywhat they think the public wants to hear, and not what they truly believe. There have been many lawsuits about abortion,but the most important was the Roe vs. Wade case in 1973. The ruling stated that a woman and herdoctor may freely decide to terminate a pregnancy during the first trimester,however, state governments can restrict abortion access after the firsttrimester with laws intended to protect the woman's health.
Abortions after fetal viability must beavailable if the woman's health or life are at risk, and state governments canprohibit other abortions. To the bestof my knowledge, those laws are still enforced today, though there areconsistent efforts to outlaw abortion permanently. Religiousviews of abortion vary, but overall, most churches are highly against abortion.The Roman Catholic Church believes that all abortions are a form of murder. However, a number of liberal and mainlineChristian churches and religious organizations have publicly stated thatabortions are sometimes an acceptable option, and should continue to be legal. I am not a very religious person, so I amnot one to say whether and abortion is right or wrong in the religiousaspect. Thepublic opinion of abortion is very hard to determine, and probably changesdaily. I believe everyone has his orher own opinion, and reason to support it. There are so many other alternatives to abortion. So many couples want a baby and cannotconceive one. If a woman is responsible enough to have sex, then she should beresponsible enough to think of the consequences and do the right thing. I think what we, as a country, need to dois educate about pregnancy and protection, rather than discuss abortion. If prevention were as large a topic ofdiscussion as abortion is, then there would not be as many pregnant women withthe option of abortion, and a major decision to make. Abortionhas, in my opinion, been one of the largest debatable issues in AmericanSociety. There are so many aspects andviews to examine before one can even begin to form their own opinion. Politicianбпs views are quite different thanthe views of a religious person.
Ibelieve the most important aspect to consider is the medical side of abortion. There are so many medical facts that makeabortion very dangerous. Personally, Iam pro-life. I do not think there isany reason for an abortion because there are so many other alternatives. After researching the facts, and seeing themedical, political and religious views, I believe most of our society wouldagree with me in saying abortion should not be an option.
Clinicalresearch provides a growing body of scientific evidence that having an abortioncan cause psychological as well as physical harm to women. Many times, after anabortion, women feel worthless and victimized because they failed at the mostnatural of human activities- the role of being a mother. Many women who have had an abortion alsosuffer from PAS ( post-abortion syndrome). Women suffering from PAS may experience drug and alcohol abuse, personalrelationship disorders, sexual dysfunction, repeated abortions, communicationdifficulties, damaged self-esteem and even attempt suicide. Even using anesthesia, 97% of womenexperience pain during an abortion. They may experience complications such as bleeding, hemorrhage,laceration of the cervix, menstrual disturbance, inflammation of thereproductive organs, and serious infection. Death of the mother is the most serious danger of abortions, but hasbeen very rare. Some evidence has beenshown that abortion can increase the risks of breast cancer. Ibelieve it is hard to understand the political views of abortion. In my opinon, politicians will often saywhat they think the public wants to hear, and not what they truly believe. There have been many lawsuits about abortion,but the most important was the Roe vs. Wade case in 1973. The ruling stated that a woman and herdoctor may freely decide to terminate a pregnancy during the first trimester,however, state governments can restrict abortion access after the firsttrimester with laws intended to protect the woman's health. Abortions after fetal viability must beavailable if the woman's health or life are at risk, and state governments canprohibit other abortions. To the bestof my knowledge, those laws are still enforced today, though there areconsistent efforts to outlaw abortion permanently. Religiousviews of abortion vary, but overall, most churches are highly against abortion.The Roman Catholic Church believes that all abortions are a form of murder. However, a number of liberal and mainlineChristian churches and religious organizations have publicly stated thatabortions are sometimes an acceptable option, and should continue to be legal. I am not a very religious person, so I amnot one to say whether and abortion is right or wrong in the religiousaspect. Thepublic opinion of abortion is very hard to determine, and probably changesdaily. I believe everyone has his orher own opinion, and reason to support it. There are so many other alternatives to abortion. So many couples want a baby and cannotconceive one. If a woman is responsible enough to have sex, then she should beresponsible enough to think of the consequences and do the right thing. I think what we, as a country, need to dois educate about pregnancy and protection, rather than discuss abortion. If prevention were as large a topic ofdiscussion as abortion is, then there would not be as many pregnant women withthe option of abortion, and a major decision to make. Abortionhas, in my opinion, been one of the largest debatable issues in AmericanSociety. There are so many aspects andviews to examine before one can even begin to form their own opinion. Politicianбпs views are quite different thanthe views of a religious person. Ibelieve the most important aspect to consider is the medical side of abortion. There are so many medical facts that makeabortion very dangerous. Personally, Iam pro-life. I do not think there isany reason for an abortion because there are so many other alternatives. After researching the facts, and seeing themedical, political and religious views, I believe most of our society wouldagree with me in saying abortion should not be an option.
Clinicalresearch provides a growing body of scientific evidence that having an abortioncan cause psychological as well as physical harm to women. Many times, after anabortion, women feel worthless and victimized because they failed at the mostnatural of human activities- the role of being a mother. Many women who have had an abortion alsosuffer from PAS ( post-abortion syndrome). Women suffering from PAS may experience drug and alcohol abuse, personalrelationship disorders, sexual dysfunction, repeated abortions, communicationdifficulties, damaged self-esteem and even attempt suicide. Even using anesthesia, 97% of womenexperience pain during an abortion. They may experience complications such as bleeding, hemorrhage,laceration of the cervix, menstrual disturbance, inflammation of thereproductive organs, and serious infection. Death of the mother is the most serious danger of abortions, but hasbeen very rare. Some evidence has beenshown that abortion can increase the risks of breast cancer. Ibelieve it is hard to understand the political views of abortion. In my opinon, politicians will often saywhat they think the public wants to hear, and not what they truly believe. There have been many lawsuits about abortion,but the most important was the Roe vs. Wade case in 1973. The ruling stated that a woman and herdoctor may freely decide to terminate a pregnancy during the first trimester,however, state governments can restrict abortion access after the firsttrimester with laws intended to protect the woman's health. Abortions after fetal viability must beavailable if the woman's health or life are at risk, and state governments canprohibit other abortions. To the bestof my knowledge, those laws are still enforced today, though there areconsistent efforts to outlaw abortion permanently. Religiousviews of abortion vary, but overall, most churches are highly against abortion.The Roman Catholic Church believes that all abortions are a form of murder. However, a number of liberal and mainlineChristian churches and religious organizations have publicly stated thatabortions are sometimes an acceptable option, and should continue to be legal. I am not a very religious person, so I amnot one to say whether and abortion is right or wrong in the religiousaspect. Thepublic opinion of abortion is very hard to determine, and probably changesdaily. I believe everyone has his orher own opinion, and reason to support it. There are so many other alternatives to abortion. So many couples want a baby and cannotconceive one. If a woman is responsible enough to have sex, then she should beresponsible enough to think of the consequences and do the right thing. I think what we, as a country, need to dois educate about pregnancy and protection, rather than discuss abortion. If prevention were as large a topic ofdiscussion as abortion is, then there would not be as many pregnant women withthe option of abortion, and a major decision to make.
Abortions after fetal viability must beavailable if the woman's health or life are at risk, and state governments canprohibit other abortions. To the bestof my knowledge, those laws are still enforced today, though there areconsistent efforts to outlaw abortion permanently. Religiousviews of abortion vary, but overall, most churches are highly against abortion.The Roman Catholic Church believes that all abortions are a form of murder. However, a number of liberal and mainlineChristian churches and religious organizations have publicly stated thatabortions are sometimes an acceptable option, and should continue to be legal. I am not a very religious person, so I amnot one to say whether and abortion is right or wrong in the religiousaspect. Thepublic opinion of abortion is very hard to determine, and probably changesdaily. I believe everyone has his orher own opinion, and reason to support it. There are so many other alternatives to abortion. So many couples want a baby and cannotconceive one. If a woman is responsible enough to have sex, then she should beresponsible enough to think of the consequences and do the right thing. I think what we, as a country, need to dois educate about pregnancy and protection, rather than discuss abortion. If prevention were as large a topic ofdiscussion as abortion is, then there would not be as many pregnant women withthe option of abortion, and a major decision to make. Abortionhas, in my opinion, been one of the largest debatable issues in AmericanSociety.
There are so many aspects andviews to examine before one can even begin to form their own opinion. Politicianбпs views are quite different thanthe views of a religious person. Ibelieve the most important aspect to consider is the medical side of abortion. There are so many medical facts that makeabortion very dangerous. Personally, Iam pro-life. I do not think there isany reason for an abortion because there are so many other alternatives. After researching the facts, and seeing themedical, political and religious views, I believe most of our society wouldagree with me in saying abortion should not be an option.
Clinicalresearch provides a growing body of scientific evidence that having an abortioncan cause psychological as well as physical harm to women. Many times, after anabortion, women feel worthless and victimized because they failed at the mostnatural of human activities- the role of being a mother. Many women who have had an abortion alsosuffer from PAS ( post-abortion syndrome). Women suffering from PAS may experience drug and alcohol abuse, personalrelationship disorders, sexual dysfunction, repeated abortions, communicationdifficulties, damaged self-esteem and even attempt suicide. Even using anesthesia, 97% of womenexperience pain during an abortion. They may experience complications such as bleeding, hemorrhage,laceration of the cervix, menstrual disturbance, inflammation of thereproductive organs, and serious infection. Death of the mother is the most serious danger of abortions, but hasbeen very rare. Some evidence has beenshown that abortion can increase the risks of breast cancer. Ibelieve it is hard to understand the political views of abortion. In my opinon, politicians will often saywhat they think the public wants to hear, and not what they truly believe. There have been many lawsuits about abortion,but the most important was the Roe vs. Wade case in 1973. The ruling stated that a woman and herdoctor may freely decide to terminate a pregnancy during the first trimester,however, state governments can restrict abortion access after the firsttrimester with laws intended to protect the woman's health. Abortions after fetal viability must beavailable if the woman's health or life are at risk, and state governments canprohibit other abortions. To the bestof my knowledge, those laws are still enforced today, though there areconsistent efforts to outlaw abortion permanently. Religiousviews of abortion vary, but overall, most churches are highly against abortion.The Roman Catholic Church believes that all abortions are a form of murder. However, a number of liberal and mainlineChristian churches and religious organizations have publicly stated thatabortions are sometimes an acceptable option, and should continue to be legal. I am not a very religious person, so I amnot one to say whether and abortion is right or wrong in the religiousaspect. Thepublic opinion of abortion is very hard to determine, and probably changesdaily. I believe everyone has his orher own opinion, and reason to support it. There are so many other alternatives to abortion. So many couples want a baby and cannotconceive one. If a woman is responsible enough to have sex, then she should beresponsible enough to think of the consequences and do the right thing. I think what we, as a country, need to dois educate about pregnancy and protection, rather than discuss abortion. If prevention were as large a topic ofdiscussion as abortion is, then there would not be as many pregnant women withthe option of abortion, and a major decision to make. Abortionhas, in my opinion, been one of the largest debatable issues in AmericanSociety. There are so many aspects andviews to examine before one can even begin to form their own opinion. Politicianбпs views are quite different thanthe views of a religious person. Ibelieve the most important aspect to consider is the medical side of abortion. There are so many medical facts that makeabortion very dangerous. Personally, Iam pro-life. I do not think there isany reason for an abortion because there are so many other alternatives.
After researching the facts, and seeing themedical, political and religious views, I believe most of our society wouldagree with me in saying abortion should not be an option.
Clinicalresearch provides a growing body of scientific evidence that having an abortioncan cause psychological as well as physical harm to women. Many times, after anabortion, women feel worthless and victimized because they failed at the mostnatural of human activities- the role of being a mother. Many women who have had an abortion alsosuffer from PAS ( post-abortion syndrome). Women suffering from PAS may experience drug and alcohol abuse, personalrelationship disorders, sexual dysfunction, repeated abortions, communicationdifficulties, damaged self-esteem and even attempt suicide. Even using anesthesia, 97% of womenexperience pain during an abortion. They may experience complications such as bleeding, hemorrhage,laceration of the cervix, menstrual disturbance, inflammation of thereproductive organs, and serious infection. Death of the mother is the most serious danger of abortions, but hasbeen very rare. Some evidence has beenshown that abortion can increase the risks of breast cancer. Ibelieve it is hard to understand the political views of abortion. In my opinon, politicians will often saywhat they think the public wants to hear, and not what they truly believe. There have been many lawsuits about abortion,but the most important was the Roe vs. Wade case in 1973. The ruling stated that a woman and herdoctor may freely decide to terminate a pregnancy during the first trimester,however, state governments can restrict abortion access after the firsttrimester with laws intended to protect the woman's health. Abortions after fetal viability must beavailable if the woman's health or life are at risk, and state governments canprohibit other abortions. To the bestof my knowledge, those laws are still enforced today, though there areconsistent efforts to outlaw abortion permanently. Religiousviews of abortion vary, but overall, most churches are highly against abortion.The Roman Catholic Church believes that all abortions are a form of murder. However, a number of liberal and mainlineChristian churches and religious organizations have publicly stated thatabortions are sometimes an acceptable option, and should continue to be legal. I am not a very religious person, so I amnot one to say whether and abortion is right or wrong in the religiousaspect. Thepublic opinion of abortion is very hard to determine, and probably changesdaily. I believe everyone has his orher own opinion, and reason to support it. There are so many other alternatives to abortion. So many couples want a baby and cannotconceive one. If a woman is responsible enough to have sex, then she should beresponsible enough to think of the consequences and do the right thing. I think what we, as a country, need to dois educate about pregnancy and protection, rather than discuss abortion. If prevention were as large a topic ofdiscussion as abortion is, then there would not be as many pregnant women withthe option of abortion, and a major decision to make.
__________________
Warning!!! This is just a sample Abortion research paper (Abortion research paper example) which cannot be used as your own paper. You can contact our custom research paper writing service which provides college and university students with high-quality custom written essays, term papers, research papers, thesis papers and dissertations on Abortion topics.
Get professional Abortion research paper writing help from our professional Ph.D. and Master's academic writers. A+ quality and 100% plagiarism are guaranteed! Feel free to ORDER A CUSTOM RESEARCH PAPER ON ABORTION RIGHT NOW and you won't be disappointed.
Politician's views are quite different thanthe views of a religious person. Ibelieve the most important aspect to consider is the medical side of abortion. There are so many medical facts that makeabortion very dangerous. Personally, Iam pro-life. I do not think there isany reason for an abortion because there are so many other alternatives. After researching the facts, and seeing themedical, political and religious views, I believe most of our society wouldagree with me in saying abortion should not be an option. Clinicalresearch provides a growing body of scientific evidence that having an abortioncan cause psychological as well as physical harm to women. Many times, after anabortion, women feel worthless and victimized because they failed at the mostnatural of human activities- the role of being a mother. Many women who have had an abortion alsosuffer from PAS ( post-abortion syndrome). Women suffering from PAS may experience drug and alcohol abuse, personalrelationship disorders, sexual dysfunction, repeated abortions, communicationdifficulties, damaged self-esteem and even attempt suicide. Even using anesthesia, 97% of womenexperience pain during an abortion. They may experience complications such as bleeding, hemorrhage,laceration of the cervix, menstrual disturbance, inflammation of thereproductive organs, and serious infection. Death of the mother is the most serious danger of abortions, but hasbeen very rare. Some evidence has beenshown that abortion can increase the risks of breast cancer. Ibelieve it is hard to understand the political views of abortion. In my opinon, politicians will often saywhat they think the public wants to hear, and not what they truly believe. There have been many lawsuits about abortion,but the most important was the Roe vs. Wade case in 1973. The ruling stated that a woman and herdoctor may freely decide to terminate a pregnancy during the first trimester,however, state governments can restrict abortion access after the firsttrimester with laws intended to protect the woman's health.
Abortions after fetal viability must beavailable if the woman's health or life are at risk, and state governments canprohibit other abortions. To the bestof my knowledge, those laws are still enforced today, though there areconsistent efforts to outlaw abortion permanently. Religiousviews of abortion vary, but overall, most churches are highly against abortion.The Roman Catholic Church believes that all abortions are a form of murder. However, a number of liberal and mainlineChristian churches and religious organizations have publicly stated thatabortions are sometimes an acceptable option, and should continue to be legal. I am not a very religious person, so I amnot one to say whether and abortion is right or wrong in the religiousaspect. Thepublic opinion of abortion is very hard to determine, and probably changesdaily. I believe everyone has his orher own opinion, and reason to support it. There are so many other alternatives to abortion. So many couples want a baby and cannotconceive one. If a woman is responsible enough to have sex, then she should beresponsible enough to think of the consequences and do the right thing. I think what we, as a country, need to dois educate about pregnancy and protection, rather than discuss abortion. If prevention were as large a topic ofdiscussion as abortion is, then there would not be as many pregnant women withthe option of abortion, and a major decision to make. Abortionhas, in my opinion, been one of the largest debatable issues in AmericanSociety. There are so many aspects andviews to examine before one can even begin to form their own opinion. Politicianбпs views are quite different thanthe views of a religious person.
Ibelieve the most important aspect to consider is the medical side of abortion. There are so many medical facts that makeabortion very dangerous. Personally, Iam pro-life. I do not think there isany reason for an abortion because there are so many other alternatives. After researching the facts, and seeing themedical, political and religious views, I believe most of our society wouldagree with me in saying abortion should not be an option.
Clinicalresearch provides a growing body of scientific evidence that having an abortioncan cause psychological as well as physical harm to women. Many times, after anabortion, women feel worthless and victimized because they failed at the mostnatural of human activities- the role of being a mother. Many women who have had an abortion alsosuffer from PAS ( post-abortion syndrome). Women suffering from PAS may experience drug and alcohol abuse, personalrelationship disorders, sexual dysfunction, repeated abortions, communicationdifficulties, damaged self-esteem and even attempt suicide. Even using anesthesia, 97% of womenexperience pain during an abortion. They may experience complications such as bleeding, hemorrhage,laceration of the cervix, menstrual disturbance, inflammation of thereproductive organs, and serious infection. Death of the mother is the most serious danger of abortions, but hasbeen very rare. Some evidence has beenshown that abortion can increase the risks of breast cancer. Ibelieve it is hard to understand the political views of abortion. In my opinon, politicians will often saywhat they think the public wants to hear, and not what they truly believe. There have been many lawsuits about abortion,but the most important was the Roe vs. Wade case in 1973. The ruling stated that a woman and herdoctor may freely decide to terminate a pregnancy during the first trimester,however, state governments can restrict abortion access after the firsttrimester with laws intended to protect the woman's health. Abortions after fetal viability must beavailable if the woman's health or life are at risk, and state governments canprohibit other abortions. To the bestof my knowledge, those laws are still enforced today, though there areconsistent efforts to outlaw abortion permanently. Religiousviews of abortion vary, but overall, most churches are highly against abortion.The Roman Catholic Church believes that all abortions are a form of murder. However, a number of liberal and mainlineChristian churches and religious organizations have publicly stated thatabortions are sometimes an acceptable option, and should continue to be legal. I am not a very religious person, so I amnot one to say whether and abortion is right or wrong in the religiousaspect. Thepublic opinion of abortion is very hard to determine, and probably changesdaily. I believe everyone has his orher own opinion, and reason to support it. There are so many other alternatives to abortion. So many couples want a baby and cannotconceive one. If a woman is responsible enough to have sex, then she should beresponsible enough to think of the consequences and do the right thing. I think what we, as a country, need to dois educate about pregnancy and protection, rather than discuss abortion. If prevention were as large a topic ofdiscussion as abortion is, then there would not be as many pregnant women withthe option of abortion, and a major decision to make. Abortionhas, in my opinion, been one of the largest debatable issues in AmericanSociety. There are so many aspects andviews to examine before one can even begin to form their own opinion. Politicianбпs views are quite different thanthe views of a religious person. Ibelieve the most important aspect to consider is the medical side of abortion. There are so many medical facts that makeabortion very dangerous. Personally, Iam pro-life. I do not think there isany reason for an abortion because there are so many other alternatives. After researching the facts, and seeing themedical, political and religious views, I believe most of our society wouldagree with me in saying abortion should not be an option.
Clinicalresearch provides a growing body of scientific evidence that having an abortioncan cause psychological as well as physical harm to women. Many times, after anabortion, women feel worthless and victimized because they failed at the mostnatural of human activities- the role of being a mother. Many women who have had an abortion alsosuffer from PAS ( post-abortion syndrome). Women suffering from PAS may experience drug and alcohol abuse, personalrelationship disorders, sexual dysfunction, repeated abortions, communicationdifficulties, damaged self-esteem and even attempt suicide. Even using anesthesia, 97% of womenexperience pain during an abortion. They may experience complications such as bleeding, hemorrhage,laceration of the cervix, menstrual disturbance, inflammation of thereproductive organs, and serious infection. Death of the mother is the most serious danger of abortions, but hasbeen very rare. Some evidence has beenshown that abortion can increase the risks of breast cancer. Ibelieve it is hard to understand the political views of abortion. In my opinon, politicians will often saywhat they think the public wants to hear, and not what they truly believe. There have been many lawsuits about abortion,but the most important was the Roe vs. Wade case in 1973. The ruling stated that a woman and herdoctor may freely decide to terminate a pregnancy during the first trimester,however, state governments can restrict abortion access after the firsttrimester with laws intended to protect the woman's health. Abortions after fetal viability must beavailable if the woman's health or life are at risk, and state governments canprohibit other abortions. To the bestof my knowledge, those laws are still enforced today, though there areconsistent efforts to outlaw abortion permanently. Religiousviews of abortion vary, but overall, most churches are highly against abortion.The Roman Catholic Church believes that all abortions are a form of murder. However, a number of liberal and mainlineChristian churches and religious organizations have publicly stated thatabortions are sometimes an acceptable option, and should continue to be legal. I am not a very religious person, so I amnot one to say whether and abortion is right or wrong in the religiousaspect. Thepublic opinion of abortion is very hard to determine, and probably changesdaily. I believe everyone has his orher own opinion, and reason to support it. There are so many other alternatives to abortion. So many couples want a baby and cannotconceive one. If a woman is responsible enough to have sex, then she should beresponsible enough to think of the consequences and do the right thing. I think what we, as a country, need to dois educate about pregnancy and protection, rather than discuss abortion. If prevention were as large a topic ofdiscussion as abortion is, then there would not be as many pregnant women withthe option of abortion, and a major decision to make.
Abortions after fetal viability must beavailable if the woman's health or life are at risk, and state governments canprohibit other abortions. To the bestof my knowledge, those laws are still enforced today, though there areconsistent efforts to outlaw abortion permanently. Religiousviews of abortion vary, but overall, most churches are highly against abortion.The Roman Catholic Church believes that all abortions are a form of murder. However, a number of liberal and mainlineChristian churches and religious organizations have publicly stated thatabortions are sometimes an acceptable option, and should continue to be legal. I am not a very religious person, so I amnot one to say whether and abortion is right or wrong in the religiousaspect. Thepublic opinion of abortion is very hard to determine, and probably changesdaily. I believe everyone has his orher own opinion, and reason to support it. There are so many other alternatives to abortion. So many couples want a baby and cannotconceive one. If a woman is responsible enough to have sex, then she should beresponsible enough to think of the consequences and do the right thing. I think what we, as a country, need to dois educate about pregnancy and protection, rather than discuss abortion. If prevention were as large a topic ofdiscussion as abortion is, then there would not be as many pregnant women withthe option of abortion, and a major decision to make. Abortionhas, in my opinion, been one of the largest debatable issues in AmericanSociety.
There are so many aspects andviews to examine before one can even begin to form their own opinion. Politicianбпs views are quite different thanthe views of a religious person. Ibelieve the most important aspect to consider is the medical side of abortion. There are so many medical facts that makeabortion very dangerous. Personally, Iam pro-life. I do not think there isany reason for an abortion because there are so many other alternatives. After researching the facts, and seeing themedical, political and religious views, I believe most of our society wouldagree with me in saying abortion should not be an option.
Clinicalresearch provides a growing body of scientific evidence that having an abortioncan cause psychological as well as physical harm to women. Many times, after anabortion, women feel worthless and victimized because they failed at the mostnatural of human activities- the role of being a mother. Many women who have had an abortion alsosuffer from PAS ( post-abortion syndrome). Women suffering from PAS may experience drug and alcohol abuse, personalrelationship disorders, sexual dysfunction, repeated abortions, communicationdifficulties, damaged self-esteem and even attempt suicide. Even using anesthesia, 97% of womenexperience pain during an abortion. They may experience complications such as bleeding, hemorrhage,laceration of the cervix, menstrual disturbance, inflammation of thereproductive organs, and serious infection. Death of the mother is the most serious danger of abortions, but hasbeen very rare. Some evidence has beenshown that abortion can increase the risks of breast cancer. Ibelieve it is hard to understand the political views of abortion. In my opinon, politicians will often saywhat they think the public wants to hear, and not what they truly believe. There have been many lawsuits about abortion,but the most important was the Roe vs. Wade case in 1973. The ruling stated that a woman and herdoctor may freely decide to terminate a pregnancy during the first trimester,however, state governments can restrict abortion access after the firsttrimester with laws intended to protect the woman's health. Abortions after fetal viability must beavailable if the woman's health or life are at risk, and state governments canprohibit other abortions. To the bestof my knowledge, those laws are still enforced today, though there areconsistent efforts to outlaw abortion permanently. Religiousviews of abortion vary, but overall, most churches are highly against abortion.The Roman Catholic Church believes that all abortions are a form of murder. However, a number of liberal and mainlineChristian churches and religious organizations have publicly stated thatabortions are sometimes an acceptable option, and should continue to be legal. I am not a very religious person, so I amnot one to say whether and abortion is right or wrong in the religiousaspect. Thepublic opinion of abortion is very hard to determine, and probably changesdaily. I believe everyone has his orher own opinion, and reason to support it. There are so many other alternatives to abortion. So many couples want a baby and cannotconceive one. If a woman is responsible enough to have sex, then she should beresponsible enough to think of the consequences and do the right thing. I think what we, as a country, need to dois educate about pregnancy and protection, rather than discuss abortion. If prevention were as large a topic ofdiscussion as abortion is, then there would not be as many pregnant women withthe option of abortion, and a major decision to make. Abortionhas, in my opinion, been one of the largest debatable issues in AmericanSociety. There are so many aspects andviews to examine before one can even begin to form their own opinion. Politicianбпs views are quite different thanthe views of a religious person. Ibelieve the most important aspect to consider is the medical side of abortion. There are so many medical facts that makeabortion very dangerous. Personally, Iam pro-life. I do not think there isany reason for an abortion because there are so many other alternatives.
After researching the facts, and seeing themedical, political and religious views, I believe most of our society wouldagree with me in saying abortion should not be an option.
Clinicalresearch provides a growing body of scientific evidence that having an abortioncan cause psychological as well as physical harm to women. Many times, after anabortion, women feel worthless and victimized because they failed at the mostnatural of human activities- the role of being a mother. Many women who have had an abortion alsosuffer from PAS ( post-abortion syndrome). Women suffering from PAS may experience drug and alcohol abuse, personalrelationship disorders, sexual dysfunction, repeated abortions, communicationdifficulties, damaged self-esteem and even attempt suicide. Even using anesthesia, 97% of womenexperience pain during an abortion. They may experience complications such as bleeding, hemorrhage,laceration of the cervix, menstrual disturbance, inflammation of thereproductive organs, and serious infection. Death of the mother is the most serious danger of abortions, but hasbeen very rare. Some evidence has beenshown that abortion can increase the risks of breast cancer. Ibelieve it is hard to understand the political views of abortion. In my opinon, politicians will often saywhat they think the public wants to hear, and not what they truly believe. There have been many lawsuits about abortion,but the most important was the Roe vs. Wade case in 1973. The ruling stated that a woman and herdoctor may freely decide to terminate a pregnancy during the first trimester,however, state governments can restrict abortion access after the firsttrimester with laws intended to protect the woman's health. Abortions after fetal viability must beavailable if the woman's health or life are at risk, and state governments canprohibit other abortions. To the bestof my knowledge, those laws are still enforced today, though there areconsistent efforts to outlaw abortion permanently. Religiousviews of abortion vary, but overall, most churches are highly against abortion.The Roman Catholic Church believes that all abortions are a form of murder. However, a number of liberal and mainlineChristian churches and religious organizations have publicly stated thatabortions are sometimes an acceptable option, and should continue to be legal. I am not a very religious person, so I amnot one to say whether and abortion is right or wrong in the religiousaspect. Thepublic opinion of abortion is very hard to determine, and probably changesdaily. I believe everyone has his orher own opinion, and reason to support it. There are so many other alternatives to abortion. So many couples want a baby and cannotconceive one. If a woman is responsible enough to have sex, then she should beresponsible enough to think of the consequences and do the right thing. I think what we, as a country, need to dois educate about pregnancy and protection, rather than discuss abortion. If prevention were as large a topic ofdiscussion as abortion is, then there would not be as many pregnant women withthe option of abortion, and a major decision to make.
__________________
Warning!!! This is just a sample Abortion research paper (Abortion research paper example) which cannot be used as your own paper. You can contact our custom research paper writing service which provides college and university students with high-quality custom written essays, term papers, research papers, thesis papers and dissertations on Abortion topics.
Get professional Abortion research paper writing help from our professional Ph.D. and Master's academic writers. A+ quality and 100% plagiarism are guaranteed! Feel free to ORDER A CUSTOM RESEARCH PAPER ON ABORTION RIGHT NOW and you won't be disappointed.
Leadership Essay
What do leaders do, and how do they help us? A leader brings organization to all types of work. Leaders facilitate teamwork, showing each individual team member his or her task. Certain leadership styles seem more effective than others in particular situations. There are three main types of leadership: autocrat, democrat, and laissez-faire. Various types of leadership are neither necessarily good nor bad, but their effectiveness depends on the situation in which they are exercised, as demonstrated in the lives of Ralph and Jack in The Lord of the Flies.
In autocrat leadership, the leader exerts full control. This type of leadership should be used in the situation that time is restricted. Skill and knowledge for the individual team members are not much required, but the leader should have both skill and knowledge. In the situation that the team doesn't know much about each other, this kind of leadership would be helpful. When each team member wishes to dominate the leader's idea, it makes this type of leader ineffective (WUJS). When the leader thinks that the team could accomplish the goal on their own, this would make autocrat leadership unsuccessful (Hovind). This leadership wouldn't be best for the individual team members that have their own ideas, skills, and knowledge because the leader controls all the thoughts and work of the individual team members. When each individual tries to express his or her skill, knowledge, opinions, and thoughts, all these would be unacceptable to the leader. The leader would try to obstruct the ability of every person because the goal would be the first priority, not the individual team member. The leader would not waste time on changing the plan, but would continue in the leader's own way (Hovind).
Democrat leadership involves teamwork and voting. This type of leadership is widely used in all places around the world. In unrestricted time, democrat would be most effective. This leadership needs motivated team members, a necessity when voting and expressing their opinion. There should be some skill and knowledge in the individual team members. This leadership would spend most time in getting ideas together, to satisfy every team member. A good democrat leader will decide wisely, as well as value input from the team. The main factor to a good democrat leadership is teamwork (Hovind). The process starts off with sharing ideas, giving out opinions and then end up with voting. This is good because everybody gets to express his or her idea and opinion. Also this leadership system helps inspire and develop the individual team members. The disadvantages of democrat leadership occur when individual team members' motivation decreases and they use their skills and knowledge less effectively. Conflict in the team causes team cooperation to decrease, as well as slows the team's process (WUJS).
Laissez-Faire leadership entails the development of individual members' motivation, knowledge, and skill. "The direct translation is "leave well alone". "Succeed or rail on their own" (Leadership Style). Laissez-Faire would be successful if the individual team member believes he has a vital role in the company. If the schedule is straightforward on what they should perform and complete each day, the task continues without difficulty. With a capable team, Laissez-Faire brings out the greatest quality of work. Laissez-Faire needs motivated individual team members; motivation helps them to continue their task. The weak point of Laissez-Faire occurs when the each person relies too heavily on the others. If the individual team member uses less of their skill and knowledge, this badly affects this type of leadership because the task wouldn't be done in the greatest quality. When the each member of the group doesn't have their own thought, this also gives disadvantages to this type of leadership. When the individual expects to be ordered, this type of leader would not be helpful to him or her, and the whole process wouldn't be effective because laissez-faire requires self-motivation from each team member (Hovind).
Democrat leadership best describes Ralph, as it is his most preferred form of leadership. This leader is the best for a group of people like what is demonstrated in the story. The reason that Ralph's leadership style did not work is that it could not be used in all types of situations. When the story started off Ralph use the idea of voting, which is democrat. For example, "Who wants me?" Every hand outside the choir except Piggy's was raised immediately. Then Piggy, too, raised his hand grudgingly into the air" (pg. 23). Ralph listened to the vote and proposed the solution based on the voting. This was best at first when they had time, but later on there were many problems about the beast, signal fire, and hunting. This started to bring Ralph's Democrat leadership to an end. Ralph needed teamwork, but Jack gives only rebellion against Ralph's leadership style and started to tremble the whole council. This form of leadership could satisfy everyone, but it did not work out that way because Jack's greed resulted in him wanting to be the chief, making this system fail. What the team was missing was motivation, skill, knowledge, and time. All the things that they were missing are the key to the full quality of the Democrat leadership. Ralph was focusing too much on the fire, but not balancing the fire and the food. Ralph made the team look over him and joined Jack's side. Ralph was not satisfying what the individual team member needed; this made Ralph's leadership style unsuccessful.
Throughout Lord of the Flies, Jack's leadership can best be described as autocratic, exerting full control over the team. Jack's leadership shows the best performance because of the situation that they are in; individual team members are not using their knowledge and skill, which causes Ralph's leadership to fail. Jack brings in autocrat leadership at the right time, when there is restricted time, and also when the team is breaking apart. The breaking apart of the team makes each individual team member expect to be commanded by a strong leader. Jack always stands up to Ralph; this shows that he maintains full control. Jack could be considered as a savage dictator, not Ralph. Jack shows the littluns and biguns that he could lead and give them the path, without them using the knowledge and skill. On the other hand, Jack's brutal character makes him a heartless leader. "He [Jack] began to dance and his laughter became a bloodthirsty snarling" (pg. 58). Jack's leadership became successful because of satisfying the teams need, food. This makes Jack a successful leader in this situation.
Through the lives of Ralph and Jack in Lord of the Flies we can see that the strength of any leadership style depends on the situation. Jack's leadership style expresses strong, confident leader, which is the Autocrat showing firmness in decision and order. On the other hand, Jack's character weaknesses overwhelm him, making him savage and brutal. Ralph's leadership demonstrates wise and kind leader, which is democratic representing cooperation, effort, and knowledge. Neither type of leadership is good or bad, but finds its strength and effectiveness only in the situation that those particular types of leadership are being used.
__________________
Warning!!! This is just a sample Leadership essay (Leadership essay example) which cannot be used as your own paper. You can contact our custom essay writing service which provides college and university students with high-quality custom written essays, term papers, research papers, thesis papers and dissertations on Leadership topics.
Get professional Leadership essay writing help from our professional Ph.D. and Master's academic writers. A+ quality and 100% plagiarism are guaranteed! Feel free to ORDER A CUSTOM ESSAY ON LEADERSHIP RIGHT NOW and you won't be disappointed.
In autocrat leadership, the leader exerts full control. This type of leadership should be used in the situation that time is restricted. Skill and knowledge for the individual team members are not much required, but the leader should have both skill and knowledge. In the situation that the team doesn't know much about each other, this kind of leadership would be helpful. When each team member wishes to dominate the leader's idea, it makes this type of leader ineffective (WUJS). When the leader thinks that the team could accomplish the goal on their own, this would make autocrat leadership unsuccessful (Hovind). This leadership wouldn't be best for the individual team members that have their own ideas, skills, and knowledge because the leader controls all the thoughts and work of the individual team members. When each individual tries to express his or her skill, knowledge, opinions, and thoughts, all these would be unacceptable to the leader. The leader would try to obstruct the ability of every person because the goal would be the first priority, not the individual team member. The leader would not waste time on changing the plan, but would continue in the leader's own way (Hovind).
Democrat leadership involves teamwork and voting. This type of leadership is widely used in all places around the world. In unrestricted time, democrat would be most effective. This leadership needs motivated team members, a necessity when voting and expressing their opinion. There should be some skill and knowledge in the individual team members. This leadership would spend most time in getting ideas together, to satisfy every team member. A good democrat leader will decide wisely, as well as value input from the team. The main factor to a good democrat leadership is teamwork (Hovind). The process starts off with sharing ideas, giving out opinions and then end up with voting. This is good because everybody gets to express his or her idea and opinion. Also this leadership system helps inspire and develop the individual team members. The disadvantages of democrat leadership occur when individual team members' motivation decreases and they use their skills and knowledge less effectively. Conflict in the team causes team cooperation to decrease, as well as slows the team's process (WUJS).
Laissez-Faire leadership entails the development of individual members' motivation, knowledge, and skill. "The direct translation is "leave well alone". "Succeed or rail on their own" (Leadership Style). Laissez-Faire would be successful if the individual team member believes he has a vital role in the company. If the schedule is straightforward on what they should perform and complete each day, the task continues without difficulty. With a capable team, Laissez-Faire brings out the greatest quality of work. Laissez-Faire needs motivated individual team members; motivation helps them to continue their task. The weak point of Laissez-Faire occurs when the each person relies too heavily on the others. If the individual team member uses less of their skill and knowledge, this badly affects this type of leadership because the task wouldn't be done in the greatest quality. When the each member of the group doesn't have their own thought, this also gives disadvantages to this type of leadership. When the individual expects to be ordered, this type of leader would not be helpful to him or her, and the whole process wouldn't be effective because laissez-faire requires self-motivation from each team member (Hovind).
Democrat leadership best describes Ralph, as it is his most preferred form of leadership. This leader is the best for a group of people like what is demonstrated in the story. The reason that Ralph's leadership style did not work is that it could not be used in all types of situations. When the story started off Ralph use the idea of voting, which is democrat. For example, "Who wants me?" Every hand outside the choir except Piggy's was raised immediately. Then Piggy, too, raised his hand grudgingly into the air" (pg. 23). Ralph listened to the vote and proposed the solution based on the voting. This was best at first when they had time, but later on there were many problems about the beast, signal fire, and hunting. This started to bring Ralph's Democrat leadership to an end. Ralph needed teamwork, but Jack gives only rebellion against Ralph's leadership style and started to tremble the whole council. This form of leadership could satisfy everyone, but it did not work out that way because Jack's greed resulted in him wanting to be the chief, making this system fail. What the team was missing was motivation, skill, knowledge, and time. All the things that they were missing are the key to the full quality of the Democrat leadership. Ralph was focusing too much on the fire, but not balancing the fire and the food. Ralph made the team look over him and joined Jack's side. Ralph was not satisfying what the individual team member needed; this made Ralph's leadership style unsuccessful.
Throughout Lord of the Flies, Jack's leadership can best be described as autocratic, exerting full control over the team. Jack's leadership shows the best performance because of the situation that they are in; individual team members are not using their knowledge and skill, which causes Ralph's leadership to fail. Jack brings in autocrat leadership at the right time, when there is restricted time, and also when the team is breaking apart. The breaking apart of the team makes each individual team member expect to be commanded by a strong leader. Jack always stands up to Ralph; this shows that he maintains full control. Jack could be considered as a savage dictator, not Ralph. Jack shows the littluns and biguns that he could lead and give them the path, without them using the knowledge and skill. On the other hand, Jack's brutal character makes him a heartless leader. "He [Jack] began to dance and his laughter became a bloodthirsty snarling" (pg. 58). Jack's leadership became successful because of satisfying the teams need, food. This makes Jack a successful leader in this situation.
Through the lives of Ralph and Jack in Lord of the Flies we can see that the strength of any leadership style depends on the situation. Jack's leadership style expresses strong, confident leader, which is the Autocrat showing firmness in decision and order. On the other hand, Jack's character weaknesses overwhelm him, making him savage and brutal. Ralph's leadership demonstrates wise and kind leader, which is democratic representing cooperation, effort, and knowledge. Neither type of leadership is good or bad, but finds its strength and effectiveness only in the situation that those particular types of leadership are being used.
__________________
Warning!!! This is just a sample Leadership essay (Leadership essay example) which cannot be used as your own paper. You can contact our custom essay writing service which provides college and university students with high-quality custom written essays, term papers, research papers, thesis papers and dissertations on Leadership topics.
Get professional Leadership essay writing help from our professional Ph.D. and Master's academic writers. A+ quality and 100% plagiarism are guaranteed! Feel free to ORDER A CUSTOM ESSAY ON LEADERSHIP RIGHT NOW and you won't be disappointed.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)